Petitioner moved that a previous order was complied with. Court closed and disposed of the contempt petition without further pronouncement.
Contempt petition closed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010047192020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/143/2020
JANNATARA BEGOM LASKAR
D/O- LT. HAFIZ UDDIN LASKAR, VILL. SIBUTTAR, P.O. UJANKUPA, P.S. HAILAKANDI, DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM).
VERSUS
KEERTHI JALIL AND ANR. THE DY. COMMISSIONER, HAILAKANDI CUM CHAIRMAN DLC, HAILAKANDI, P.O., P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. PIN- 788151.
2:I.H. BARBHUIYA
THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI P.O. P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM. PIN- 788151
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 13-02-2024
Page No.# 2/2
Ms. A. Begum learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court dated 14.08.2019, passed in WP(C) No. 4873/2019 is duly complied with.
In view of the above the present contempt petition stands closed and disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
JANNATARA BEGOM LASKAR
KEERTHI JALIL AND ANR
KARDAK ETE
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
