Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ court order. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 08.09.2023 in WP(C) No.4612/2023 stood complied with and nothing remained to adjudicate; the High Court accordingly dropped the contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010005392024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/18/2024
DALILUR RAHMAN
S/O LATE MOKBUL HUSSAIN, R/O ONDOLAJHAR, P.O.-DHULA, P.S.DHULA, DIST-DARRANG, ASSAM
VERSUS
SUMIT SATTAWAN, IAS
THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI, P.O.HENGRABARI, DIST-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781036
For the petitioner (s) : Mr. M. Khan, Advocate
For the respondent (s) : Ms. M. Barman, Govt. Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
09.02.2024
Mr. M. Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 08.09.2023 passed in WP(C) No.4612/2023 has been duly complied with, and as such, nothing further remains in the instant contempt petition to adjudicate.
Page No.# 2/2
2. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition stands dropped.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Dalilur Rahman
Sumit Sattawan, IAS, The District Commissioner, Kamrup (M), Guwahati
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
