Allowed

Idrish Ali v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC1 Sept 2024Bail Appln./2231/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court granted regular bail to petitioning Idrish Ali in a kidnapping and related charges case involving trafficking of women and children. The bail was conditioned on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000 with a surety of similar amount and complying with investigation cooperation, territorial restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Released on regular bail with a bond of Rs. 30,000/- and a surety of like amount, subject to judicial satisfaction and undertaking to cooperate with investigation, remain within territory, and not tam

Idrish Ali Vs the State of Assam — Bail and Remand | Gauhati HC (2024)

¶1

Page No.# 1/2

¶2

GAHC010150702024

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

¶4

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Bail Appln./2231/2024

¶6

IDRISH ALI S/O JAHARUDDIN ALI, R/O SATRAKONARA, P.S.-BAGBAR, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, MR. O ULLAH,I AMIN,MS. N SULTANA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶10

BEFORE

¶11

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Date : 02.09.2024

¶14

Heard Mr. M. H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P., Assam, appearing on behalf of the sole respondent.

¶15

The present application has been instituted, praying for regular bail in connection with Bhangagarh Police Station Case No. 87/2024 registered u/s. 363 read with Sections 370/370A/365/366/372/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

I have also perused the CD and also heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶17

Page No.# 2/2

¶18

On a consideration of the matter and also considering the length of detention undergone by the petitioner, herein; it is hereby provided that the petitioner shall be released on regular bail in connection with Bhangagarh Police Station Case No. 87/2024 registered u/s. 363 read with Sections 370/370A/365/366/372/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- with a surety of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M), on the following terms and conditions, that:

¶19

(i) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation of the case;

¶20

(ii) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction without obtaining prior permission of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M); and

¶21

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Police Officer and/or tamper with the evidence of the case.

¶22

With the above directions and observations, this bail application stands disposed of.

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

Comparing Assistant

Idrish Ali v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Idrish Ali v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. Lalnuntluanga Vs State of Mizoram and 4 Ors.

Smt. Lalvuani Vs State of Mizoram represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 5 Ors.

Sh. Vanlalthuama Vs The State of Mizoram R/b the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 5 Ors.

Economic Development Organisation Vs the Union of India and 6 Ors.

Sajidur Rahman Vs the State of Assam

Raja Sonowal @ Raja Saikia Vs the State of Assam