Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous on the submission that the subject-matter of the petition had become so.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No. 1/1
GAHC010019422014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/617/2014
VIVEK PHARMACHEM INDIA LTD.
A COMPANY REGD. UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, AND HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT A-11, SETHI COLONY, JAIPUR-302004, INDIA AND IS REP. BY DULY AUTHORIZED DIRECTOR SHRI KULDEEP GUPTA, S/O LT. RAJ KUMAR GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS., R/O C-136 DAYANAND MARG TILAK NAGAR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
VERSUS
MS. BINAPANI BASUMATARY
THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, ASSAM, HENGABRI, GHY-36
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A CHUTIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MS.A DAS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 12-06-2023
Mr. M. Sahewalla, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instruction, that the subject-matter of the contempt petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Sahewalla, learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
VIVEK PHARMACHEM INDIA LTD.
MS. BINAPANI BASUMATARY
THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, ASSAM
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
