This contempt case was closed by the Gauhati High Court after the petitioner submitted that a speaking order had been issued by the authorities in the underlying writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010218052022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/601/2022
MATAB UDDIN
S/O ABDUR RAHMAN, VILL- LATHIMARA, P.S.-KATHIGARAH, DISTCACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788805
VERSUS
JISHNU BARUA
CHAIRMAN, ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P N GOSWAMI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 13/06/2023
Heard Mr. M.A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent.
Mr. Choudhury submits that in terms of the order dated 10/01/2022 passed by this Court in
WP(C) 5432/2021, a speaking order has already been issued by the authorities. As such, this
Page No.# 2/2
contempt case can be closed.
Mr. Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent has also produced a copy of the speaking order
dated 10/01/2023.
In view of the above, this contempt case stands closed.
JUDGE
sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
MATAB UDDIN
JISHNU BARUA
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
