Petitioner's counsel sought closure of contempt petition on compliance of underlying order; Judge granted prayer and closed the contempt petition.
Contempt petition closed; prayer allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010049982023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/161/2023
M/S BARAK ISPAT PVT. LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI RONAK AGARWAL, S/O- SRI RAJENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL, G.C. COLLEGE ROAD, SILCHAR, P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR, DIST.CACHAR,ASSAM
VERSUS
DR. LAKSMAN S. AND ANR
SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE AND CHAIRMAN OF STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM
2:OINAM SARAN KUMAR SINGH COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE UDYOG BHWAN BAMUNIMAIDAN GUWAHATI-781021
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS N SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 03-05-2023
Ms. N Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present contempt petition can be closed as the order dated 23.06.2022
Page No.# 2/2
passed in WP(C) No. 4080/2019 has been complied with.
Prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed.
Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/S BARAK ISPAT PVT. LTD.
DR. LAKSMAN S.
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
