Petitioner withdrew the contempt petition stating respondent authorities complied with a prior order. Court dismissed the proceeding as it was not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010074742023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/205/2023
ABDUL JALIL MAZUMDER S/O- LATE TAYOB ALI MAZUMDER, VILL. AND P.O.- RANGAUTI PART-I, P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN- 788151.
VERSUS
SURANJANA SENAPATI, ACS AND ANR THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19.
2:MURCHANA MALAKAR
THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
HAILAKANDI
DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM
PIN- 788151
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S B LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
05/04/2023
Heard Ms. N Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner.
On instructions of the petitioner, Ms. N Kalita, learned counsel submitted that the respondent authorities have already complied with the order dated 06.01.2023 passed in WP(C) No. 7922/2022 and as such, the petitioner is not pressing this contempt petition.
Accordingly, this contempt petition, being not pressed, stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Abdul Jalil Mazumder
Suranjana Senapati
The Director of Elementary Education, Assam
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
