The Court closed the contempt case after finding that the order dated 30/03/2023 was complied with, though subject to the petitioner's liberty to assail the said order.
The contempt case stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010000592023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/12/2023
LOHIT DAS
S/O- LATE PHANI DAS, R/O- HOUSE NO. 24, NABAGRAHA CHITRACHALL, P.O. KHARGHULI, P.S. LATASHIL, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781004.
VERSUS
MEGHA NIDHI DAHAL
THE COMMISSIONER, GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GMDA COMPLEX, 2ND FLOOR, P.O. AND P.S. BHANGAGHAR, GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781005.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K PUJARI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S BORA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 10/04/2023
Mr. K. Pujari, learned counsel is present on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. S. Bora, learned
counsel for the respondent has produced a copy of the order dated 30/03/2023 to submit that the request of the petitioner in terms of the order of this Court has been considered but many of his requests could not be granted due to the reasons mentioned in the order.
Page No.# 2/2
If that be so, it cannot now be said that the order of this Court has not been complied with.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the order dated 30/03/2023, if so advised.
With the above observation, the contempt case stands closed.
A copy of the order dated 30/03/2023 be retained in the case record.
JUDGE
sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
Lohit Das
Megha Nidhi Dahal
The Commissioner, Guwahati Municipal Corporation
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
