Parvez Sultan Mazumdar v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition concerning payment for vehicle hiring charges was closed as infructuous after evidence established the petitioner had already been paid.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010146382021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4801/2021
PARVEZ SULTAN MAZUMDAR
S/O DR. ABDUL MATIN MAZUMDER
R/O HOUSE NO. 4, ANJALI UPAPATH, AJANTA PATH BELTOLA SURVEY, GUWAHATI 28, PO BELTOLA, PS DISPUR ,DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 06
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD(ROADS) ASSAM.CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 03
3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PWD NALBARI ROAD CIRLCE NALBARI 781353
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parvez Sultan Mazumdar
- respondent
The State of Assam
- respondent
The Chief Engineer PWD(Roads) Assam
- respondent
The Superintending Engineer PWD Nalbari Road Circle
- respondent
The Executive Engineer PWD Barpeta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/4801/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court