The writ petitioner formally withdrew the petition. The court disposed of the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed.
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010114262022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3908/2022
PHANIDHAR DAS
S/O- LATE BIDYA RAM DAS, R/O- VILL.- MAYANGURI, P.O.BHUBHANDHA, P.S. MORIGAON, DIST.- MORIGAON, PIN- 782104, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date :09/08/2022
Mr. T.R. Sen, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that as per instruction received by him, the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition any further. Therefore, the writ petition be disposed of as not pressed.
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. R. Talukdar, learned Government Advocate, Assam is present on behalf of the respondents
and does not have any objection if the prayer is allowed.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE
sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
Phanidhar Das
The State of Assam
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
