Baikuntha Lakhar v. Rakesh Kumar and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging violation of an earlier order directing payment of pensionary benefits. Respondents submitted letters showing compliance. Court closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
None granted; petitioner remained committed to following up by producing papers before the Court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010054032021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/163/2021
BAIKUNTHA LAKHAR
S/O. LT. HARENDRA LAHKAR, VILL. RANGIA, WARD NO.7, P.O. AND P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781354.
VERSUS
RAKESH KUMAR AND 2 ORS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06.
2:GULJARI LAL (I.A. AND A.S.) THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29. 3:ANISUR RAHMAN
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BOROLIA DIVISION (IRRIGATION) TAMULPUR ASSAM PIN-781367
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P N GOSWAMI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition challenging the non-compliance of a previous order directing pensionery benefits payment is maintainable given the respondents' submission of compliance evidence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BAIKUNTHA LAKHAR
- respondent
RAKESH KUMAR AND 2 ORS
Coram
NANI TAGIA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/163/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court