In a contempt case, the Gauhati High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other permissible remedies.
Prayer allowed to withdraw the contempt case with liberty to pursue other permissible remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010114602022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/319/2022
DINABANDHU NAYAK AND ANR. (STAKE HOLDER MANAGEMENT), S/O- LATE LAYON CH. NAYAK, R/OVILL. AND P.O. AMRIKHOWA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781307.
2: ARUN DAS (STAKE HOLDER FISHING OPERATION) S/O- DINESH DAS R/O- VILL.- BA PARA P.O. CHAUNGA DIST. BARPETA P.S. TARABARI PIN- 783015 ASSA
VERSUS
PRASANTA BORKAKATI MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., BIMALA PARASAD CHALIHA ROAD, CHACHAL, VIP ROAD, GUWAHATI-781036, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K MAHAJAN
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2
17.06.2022
Mr. B. K. Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this contempt case with liberty for his client to pursue
appropriate remedy as may be permissible under the law.
Prayer allowed.
This Contempt Case stands closed on withdrawal with the liberty, as
prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Dinabandhu Nayak and Anr.
Prasanta Borkakati and Another
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
