The Court held the contempt petition closed due to substantial compliance with a previous order, noting the absence of counsel for the petitioner and evidence of compliance from the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010032142022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/105/2022
ISRAFIL ALI
S/O LATE KAZIM UDDIN, VILL-ADHALVITA, P.O.-BHURAGAON, DISTMORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782121
VERSUS
JADAV SAIKIA, ACS AND ANR SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:SARANGA PANI SHARMA DIRECTOR INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT ULUBARI GUWAHATI-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S Ali
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. M D BORAH (r-1,2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
12.08.2022
None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Ms. MD Borah, learned counsel for the respondents submits that order of this Court has been complied with. In this connection, Ms. Borah, learned counsel has placed before this Court a communication
Page No.# 2/2
dated 28.04.2022.
In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that there is substantial compliance of the order of this Court and accordingly the contempt petition stands closed.
A copy of the order dated 28.04.2022 is made part of the records.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
ISRAFIL ALI
JADAV SAIKIA
SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
SARANGA PANI SHARMA
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
