Writ petition filed by petitioners against the State was dismissed for default due to non-appearance. The petitioner's counsel was absent; the respondent argued the matter was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010005872016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/68/2016
RANADITYA BARMAN and ANR.
S/O- LT. NAGENDRA NARAYAN BARMAN, R/O- WARD NO. 3, P.O. and P.S.ABHAYAPURI, DIST.- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783384.
2: KESHAB RAJBONGSHI S/O- LT. GUNADHAR RAJBONGSHI VILL. and P.O.- NO. 2 DARANAPAR P.S.- TAMULPUR DIST.- BAKSA PIN- 781360
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
TO BE REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE WPT and BC DEPTT., GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WPT and BC DEPTT. DISPUR GHY- 6 ASSAM.
3:BIRESWAR SAIKIA CHAIRMAN KOCH RAJBONGSHI DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ASSAM HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT BORBARI GHY- 36
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.M K SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : MS.P BORAH R-3
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
12-08-2022
None appears for the petitioners on call.
On the other hand, Shri S.K. Sarkar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 has submitted that his client is no longer there and therefore the matter has become infructuous.
Without going into that aspect of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ranaditya Barman and ANR
The State of Assam
BC Deptt, Govt of Assam
Bireswar Saikia
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
