Writ petition held infructuous. Matter disposed of as the petitioner presented no opposing argument and the respondent did not oppose closure. No substantive decision recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010020862016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4311/2016
TRISHNA SARMAH DAS
W/O SRI DUSYANTA SARMAH DAS, VILL. JUGONIAGAON, P.O. GANAKPUKHURI, P.S. DERGAON, PIN-785622, DIST- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEV., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:DAKHIN GURJOGONIA GAON PANCHAYT
Page No.# 2/2
10:RATUL KALIT
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.M D BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 03-12-2020
Mr. M. Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that the
matter has become infructuous and can be closed.
Ms. K. Phukan, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State is present but does not oppose the submission made by the petitioner’s counsel.
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Trishna Sarma Das
The State of Assam
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
