The petition was disposed of as infructuous because the period for settlement had lapsed. The earlier interim order was vacated.
This writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. The interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010222582017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4676/2017
IMRAN HUSSAIN
R/O- VILL- JAPARIA, P.O- TOPTOLA, P.S- BHURAGAON, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, TRANSORT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6
2:THE SECRETARY
3:THE JOINT SECRETARY
4:THE DIRECTOR
5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONE
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.H MAZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Page No.# 2/2
ORDER
Date : 03-12-2020
Mr. N. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the period of settlement involved in this proceeding has already lapsed and therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. K. Phukan, learned Government Advocate, Assam is present on behalf of the official respondents.
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
The interim order passed earlier shall stand vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Imran Hussain
The State of Assam
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
