The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition on withdrawal by the petitioner, noting that the grievances were redressed during its pendency.
The writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010005562018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/232/2018
RATAN DAIMARY
S/O. LT. AMIN DAIMARY, PRESENT ADDRESS- VILLAGE LANGRIMUKH, P.O. DIYUNGMUKH, P.S. DIYUNGMUKH, DIST. DIMA HASAO, HALFLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782448. EARLIER ADDRESS- GURUNGJULI (LALABARAHI), P.O. ANSUMAI, P.S. RANGAPARA, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN-784505.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SONITPUR
6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER OF CHARIDUAR REVENUE CIRCL
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
02-12-2020
Shri M.R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed.
Accordingly, he submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition.
The writ petition accordingly stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
RATAN DAIMARY
THE STATE OF ASSAM
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
