Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Anr. v. Sanatan Nath and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010031982020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010031982020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010031982020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/383/2020
In WP(C) No. 66 of 2019
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIA OIL BHAWAN G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI 400051
2: THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (LPG SALES
VERSUS
SANATAN NATH AND ANR
S/O SRI SARATH NATH, R/O VILL. RAJA MAYONG, P.O. AND P.S. MAYONG, DIST. PIN 782411, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM.
2:JADAB BORA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D K SARMAH Advocate for the Respondent : MR G JALAN
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
02-12-2020
In view of the order passed today in the connected writ petition i.e. WP(C) No. 66/2019, no further order is called for in the interlocutory application, which is accordingly dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interlocutory application requires a separate order.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Sanatan Nath
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court