The writ petitioner appeared but informed the court that he had expired. The court deemed the subject matter as not requiring further adjudication and closed the writ petition.
The writ petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010066622018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2120/2018
MAZAHIR UDDIN BORBHUYAN
S/O. LATE ABDUL WAHID BARBHUYAN, R/O. VILL. BERENGA, P.O. SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEE
3:THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULURE ASSAM
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (AGRI) SILCHAR
5:THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CID ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
02-12-2020
Shri H. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received the information that the petitioner has expired in the meantime.
Considering the subject matter in dispute, the writ petition is accordingly closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Mazahir Uddin Borbhuyan
The State of Assam
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
