Rubita Tanti v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel stated grievances were redressed during pendency. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010007822017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/524/2018
RUBITA TANTI
C/O- UTTAM TANTI, RAJGORH ALI TEA ESTATE, P.O. MAKUM, DISTTINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786170
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (A) DEPTT., ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GHY-6, ASSAM
2:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES
- 3:THE DIRECTOR
4:THE DIRECTO
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. D GHOSH
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rubita Tanti
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/524/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court