Hitesh Barman v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
This order allowed an application to delete unparliamentary words from a bail petition attributed to a typographical error.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed; unparliamentary words to be deleted; corrected petition to be filed within one week.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010164022020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.) No.544/2020 In AB No.3132/2020
HITESH BARMAN
S/O. LAKHI KANTA BARMAN, R/O. MALIGAON, GOSALA, MITHAAMTAL, P.S.-JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI, KMARUP(M), GUWAHATI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE P.P., ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N BARMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application to delete unparliamentary words from a bail petition arising from a typographical error should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Hitesh Barman
- respondent
The State of Assam Rep. By the P.P., Assam
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.)/544/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court