An application for the withdrawal of a 10(d) order (T.O.A. No.10 of 2025) was allowed as the matter was amicably settled via One Time Settlement, and the order is considered disposed of as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of T.O.A. No.10 of 2025 allowed as matter settled via One Time Settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 04.02.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.10 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Pooja Sahoo i/b M/s. Manish Tiwari & Asso., Advocate for Applicant. None for Defendant. Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.98 of 2026 supported by affidavit for withdrawal of the T.O.A. No.10 of 2025. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled as One Time Settlement with the Defendants for a sum of Rs.2,30,97,513.38/- and has been received by the Applicant Bank. Now, the Applicant Bank wants to withdraw the T.O.A. with the Defendant unconditionally. In the light of the statement made by Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, withdrawal of I.A. No.98 of 2026 is allowed. Resultantly, T.O.A. No.10 of 2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. |
Page 1 of 2
| File be consigned to the Record Room | ||
|---|---|---|
| after due compliance. | ||
| Sd/- | Closed | |
| P.O. | ||
| s.u. -4 | DRT-II |
Page 2 of 2
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ms Pooja Sahoo
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
