Allowed
Bank of Baroda v. Vison Refractories Pvt. Ltd.
DRTOA/612/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 03.02.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.612 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Yash Naik i/b Mr Rajesh Dubey, Advocate for the Applicant. None for Defendants. |
|||
| 8 9 |
Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed vakalatnama (exhibit-8) and I.A. No.262 of 2026 supported by affidavit (exhibit-9) for withdrawal of the O.A. No.612 of 2023. Heard on I.A. No.262 of 2026, for withdrawal. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the previous order has been complied with by depositing Rs.10,000/- with the DRT Bar Association, Mumbai and annexed the receipt in support of arguments. Ld. Advocate further submits that the matter has been settled with the Defendants for a sum of Rs.60 lakhs and now, the Applicant does not wish to pursue with this O.A. Hence, seeks for withdrawal of the present O.A. In view of the above submissions, the withdrawal of I.A. No.262 of 2026 is allowed. Resultantly, O.A. No.612 of 2023 stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
¶2
Page 1 of 2
¶3
| Pending IA, if any, stands disposed of. | ||
|---|---|---|
| The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. |
||
| rst - 17 | File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
¶4
Page 2 of 2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Mr Yash Naik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Deepak M. Thakkar
- Order 2 — this page · H K Kaushik
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court