Single judge order dismissing Special Appeal No.163 of 2022 as Applicant's counsel stated having no instructions and that the Applicant is not interested in proceeding further.
Special Appeal No.163 of 2022 dismissed and matter disposed of as Applicant is not interested in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 06.02.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.163 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Anushree Talekar i/b Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for the Applicant. None for Respondent. |
|||
| Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that she has no instructions from his client. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.163 of 2022 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
|||
| s.u - 13 | Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondent
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
