Vijay Raj Dave v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposal of an arbitrariness petition as infructuous due to the closure of the underlying bank account by the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
What did the court decide?
The application was disposed of as infructuous and pending interpetations were disposed of.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 26
Case No.SA/848/2025
VIJAY RAJ DAVE Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
Date: 09.03.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Hitesh Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that the account has been closed and SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent, SA stands disposed of as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed of, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Parties & counsel
- applicant
VIJAY RAJ DAVE
- respondent
ICICI BANK LIMITED
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court