The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's application due to the Respondent Bank's unconditional apology for issuing a Section 13(2) notice despite pending litigation.
No expenses to be debited from applicant's account; all pending interim applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 39
Case No.SA/604/2025
SEEMA DEVI Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 09.03.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Akarsh Mathur, Counsel for the Applicant Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, bank has issued the notice under Section 13(2) despite pendency of this litigation.
Counsel for the bank tenders unconditional apology and submits that bank will take care of this in future. In case securitization application is pending, they will take prior permission for issuance of fresh notice under Section 13(2).
In view of this SA stands disposed of, no expenses shall be debited from the account of applicant, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Seema Devi
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
