The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur clarified the legal meaning of 'restoration' of possession, clarifying it implies restoration to the party from whom possession was taken, noting no impact on other actions before disposing of the Special Appeal.
The Special Appeal and all pending interim applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 12
Case No.SA/459/2025
SMT PRIYA SINGH Vs HERO HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 07.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Vikas Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the respondent submits that they are in fix as to whom the possession has to be restored.
The work “restoration” itself indicates that Respondent has to restore the possession from whom the possession was taken. The Tribunal hopes this clarifies the position. The Civil and Criminal actions taken by the parties will not be affected by the disposal of this SA.
Accordingly, SA stands disposed of, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Smt Priya Singh
Hero Housing Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
