Dhapu Devi v. Idfc First Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bank admitted delay in replying to Section 13(3A) objections, leading to earlier quashing; resumed proceedings following reply.
What did the court decide?
Application and all pending IAs disposed; proceedings to continue as per law.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 53
Case No.SA/3/2025
DHAPU DEVI Vs IDFC FIRST BANK LTD
Date: 09.03.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Piyush Khandelwal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, on 15.10.2025, the respondent bank has admitted that fact that reply to objections under 13(3A) have not been given by the bank. Therefore, proceedings after the objection filed under Section 13(3A) were quashed.
Now the bank has replied the objections under 13(3A), they are further proceeding as per law.
In view of the above, this SA stands disposed of, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
DHAPU DEVI
- respondent
IDFC FIRST BANK LTD
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court