In a summary application where the applicant failed to appear, the Presiding Officer dismissed the SA and disposed of pending IAs due to lack of communication with the legal representative.
Application and pending IAs dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 48
Case No.SA/636/2023
NAHAR SINGH Vs SUPREME HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 09.03.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Raj Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Akshat Kulshrestha, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the applicant submits that he was earlier appearing in the matter. Applicant has expired and he tried to contact the legal representative, but had no communication.
In view of the above, SA stands disposed of as dismissed, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
NAHAR SINGH
SUPREME HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
