In a securitization application, the tribunal disposed of the matter as infructuous because the account stood settled based on the applicant's submission.
The Securitization Application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 65
Case No. SA/474/2024
MOHAMMED ANSAR KHAN Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA
Date: 25.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Nasir Khan, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Divesh Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that account stands settled. Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Mohammed Ansar Khan
Union Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
