The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a secutritization application due to absence of instructions from the applicant's counsel, resulting in non-prosecution.
Securitization Application dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 51
Case No. SA/268/2025
YUSUF KHAN Vs INTEGRAL URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
Date: 25.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Advocate Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma has pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed on account of nonprosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
YUSUF KHAN
INTEGRAL URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
