Disposed
Mr Vikash Kumar Sharma v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
DRTSA/241/2026
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 61
Case No.SA/241/2026
MR VIKASH KUMAR SHARMA Vs EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Date: 24.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Raghav Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel along with Shri Heera Lal Saini, Authorized Officer for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the respondent FI submits that inadvertently notices could not be issued to one of the borrower. He seeks liberty of this Tribunal to issue corrigendum to the notice under Section 13(2) and submits that they will wait for 60 days after service of that notice to the person who was left out.
Notices be issued to the remaining borrower. No corrigendum to be issued as it is an amendment to the earlier notice.
Applicant is at liberty to approach the respondent FI for settlement. Expenses of the proceedings should not be debited to the applicant.
Accordingly, SA stands disposed of, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
MR VIKASH KUMAR SHARMA
EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court