Bindu Devi Bafna v. Icici Bank Limited
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 3
Case No. RA/3/2026 IN SA/313/2026
BINDU DEVI BAFNA Vs ICICI BANK LIMITED
Date: 30.07.2026. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Shresth Mathur, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Akash Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, there is no merit in the Review Application and the Securitization Application no. 313/2026 dismissed on the basis of the pleadings and the arguments. If the applicant was aggrieved, they could have gone in the appeal for challenging the order.
The applicant will be at liberty to challenge the actions of the bank as and when the bank proceed. Today, the auction has not taken place as no bid has been received.
In view of the above, this Review Application stands
dismissed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bindu Devi Bafna
- respondent
ICICI Bank Limited
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court