Miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a dismissed securitization application was dismissed. The court held that the underlying Rule 7(11) CPC application filed by the bank had already been dismissed, rendering no order necessary on the restoration plea.
Application for restoration of Securitization Application No. 752/2023 was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 38
Case No. MA/36/2025 IN SA/752/2023
ZEENAT PARVEEN Vs FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT COMPANY LTD
Date: 03.08.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Vineet Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
This Misc. Application filed by the applicant for restoration of the Securitization Application no. 752/2023 which was dismissed on the ground as stated in the order for non-disclosure of the pendency of the civil suit and the civil suit is still pending.
The application of Rule 7(11) of CPC filed by the bank has already dismissed.
In view of the above, this Misc. Application stands dismissed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
ZEENAT PARVEEN
FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT COMPANY LTD
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
