Bank of Baroda v. Chhitar Meena
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought to withdraw order and refund of court fees. Held, prayer allowed; fees refunded accordingly; OA disposed.
What did the court decide?
Prayer to withdraw OA and refund court fees allowed.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 132
Case No. OA/75/2025
BANK OF BARODA Vs CHHITAR MEENA
Date: 25.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Ayush Kumar Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- intervenor
Chhitar Meena
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court