The order records lack of representation by the Applicant despite notices. Finding the Applicant not interested, the order dismisses and disposes of O.A. No.643 of 2023 and pending IAs, consigning the file to the Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 27.07.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.643 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| su – 34 | None for the parties. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 29.06.2026 shows that last chance was given for taking steps for substitution of service of summons. No representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the parties either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, O.A. No.643 of 2023 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
