Mr R Ganesan v. the Authorized Officer Allahabad Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of M.A. No.81 of 2024 as infructuous based on the applicant's submission without further reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 23.07.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.81 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Bharat Godhavi and Mr Parth Talkar i/b M/s. Tejesh Dande & Asso., Advocates for the Applicant. None for Defendants. |
|||
| Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the present M.A. No.81 of 2024 has become infructuous and can be disposed of accordingly. In the light of submission made by Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, M.A. No.81 of 2024 stands disposed of as infructuous. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
|||
| rst – 25 | Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court