Disposed

Mr Sahanur Islam and Anr. v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

DRT13 Nov 2025SA/822/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed pending applications as withdrawn. The Applicant filed an application to withdraw the main appeal, stating the matter was amicably settled. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Main S.A. and I.A.s allowed as withdrawn; Respondent directed to return title deed.

Mr Sahanur Islam and Anr. versus Cholamandalam Investment and… — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2025)

¶1

Debts Recovery^{Tribunal-3, Kolkata} Order Sheet (Continuation)

¶2

caseNo.SAl82	Mr.Sahanur^{Islam& Anr'} Vs, cholamandalam ^{rnve3tment& Flnancec} I 2l2025	^9l!!!!L Oftlcactonwltn
	Orderwith^signature	.
OrderNo.02 Dt.13.11.2025 Sl.No.20	File beconsigned^{toRecord Roomafterobserving allformalities'} (KamalDe) PresidlngOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata Prctant! ForApplicant^{:Ld. Counsel Kausik Das} Foroefendant^:None lA/4579l25^{is taken upforhearlng'} HeardLd.counsel^{forSAApplicant'} Considered. NoneapPea6^{fortheDefendant'} Ldcounsel^{for theApplicantfiledI A'No4579of2025praying} ilriiJ-""t^{of themainS A'Theappli@tion is supportedbv} o,ii"r,i "tthe^{applicantMr'sahanurlslamDurlngthe} r1""","t^irt.s.r.'. matter^haso::"Tt:Y:]:l^^tl: ;;;;;;:,"i F.l.andthe^{RespondentF l isnotsoinsto} al"i"r"i,ft^{theinstant proceedingsincethisisanamicable} .",ai".""^{betweenthepartiesandtheApplicant intendsto} 'inJ."",tt"^{mainS.A,,no prejudicewillbecaused ifthe IA is} "ri"r"l',ttinvitingresponsefrom othersideAccordingly' ii" r"",^{l.A.isallowedandstands disposedofas wlthdrawn} andsettted^{amicably.I.A.No4578of2025beingthe putup} petitionisalso disPosed^of. Respondent^{F,l. isdirectedtoreturntheTitleOeedofthe} ,"[g"t"a^{propertytotheSA Applicant'if itisnotalready} Jonui-i,t,"^{tsouvtfromthe date ofthls order'asper rules'} S.A, No. 822^{of2025 alongwith allother pendingl A s'ifany'} is disposedof^aswithdrawn'

Mr Sahanur Islam and Anr. v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Sahanur Islam and Anr. v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Canara Bank versus M/S Ram Thakur Bhandar

Karur Vysya Bank versus Sangeet Singh and Anr.

Bank of India versus Ms Biswas Krishi Bhandar and Ors.

Bank of Baroda versus Ms Kalpana Industries and Ors.

Smt Soma Mondal and Anr. versus Uco Bank

Punjab National Bank versus Ms Idcon Enterprise and Ors.