In S.A. No. 728/2024, the DRT disposed of a Pre-Securitization Application as infructuous after the respondent's counsel submitted that the account had been regularized by the applicant; the applicant was unrepresented. The case closed.
The Pre-Securitization Application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction taken with date |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| S.A. No.728/2024 10.11.2025 SL. No.50 |
Shri Lakshyadeep Srivastava Counselfortherespondent-F.I.ispresent None appears for the applicant. Ld. Counsel for the respondent submits that account has beenregulari bythe applicant. |
Ld. . -F.I. zed |
|
| In view of the fact, the pre Securitization Application is disposed being infructuous. Let the file be consigned torec room. Order be uploaded on the Tribun website. (Dictated) (Pravas Kuma PresidingOffi (Mugish) |
sent off ord al’s lgh) cer |
Unknown Applicant
F.I.
Pravas Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
