Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a Securitization Application for default, withstanding the applicant's absence from the hearing and the respondent bank's presence.
Securitization Application dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.424/2024 10. 1 1 .2025 SL.No.51 |
Shri Arun Pratap Singh Ld. Counselfor the respondent bank ispresent. None appearsfortheapplicant It is pointed out that the applicant isnot taking steps sincelong. Accordingly, the presentSecuritization Application is dismissedfor default. Let the file be consigned to record room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website (Dictated) <br>(Pravas Kur Singh) PresidingnHcer (Mugish) |
Applicant
Respondent Bank
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
