The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Special Appeal S.A.No.672/2022 due to the default of the applicant who failed to appear. No reasons were given other than inactivity for a long time. The file was consigned to the record room.
The Special Appeal was dismissed for default and the file consigned to the record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Dateof orderor >roceedinJ |
Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.672/2022 06.11.2025 SI No.32 |
None appearedfortheapplica Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Counsel for therespondent-ban present. Ifindthatapplicantisnotta any steps sincelong,accordingly, SAisdismissedfordefault. Let thefilebeconsigne recordroom. Order be uploaded on Tribunal’swebsite. |
nt. Ld. kis king the dto the |
|
| (Dictated) (PravasKumar. PresidingOffi (Veeresh) |
',gh) cer |
Applicant
Respondent-Bank
Pravas Kumar
Veeresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
