Dismissed
Aryan Awasthi v. Punjab National Bank
DRTSA/67/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.67/2022 10.11.2025 SL.No.39 |
Shri Sanjeev Sharma Ld. Counselfor the respondent bank ispresent. None appearsfortheapplicant. I find that the applicant is nottaking steps sincelong. Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submits that the applicant has lost interestin thecase. In view of the fact, the present Securitization Application is dismissedfor default. Let the file be consigned to record room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) (PravasKu„,,„._.ngh) PresidingOfficer (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- respondent
Shri Sanjeev Sharma
- applicant
Applicant
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court