The Special Appeal filed by the Applicant stands dismissed for want of appearance and lack of representation, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
The Special Appeal No.415 of 2025 was dismissed due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 19.12.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.415 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. |
|||
| rst – 47 | Mr Rohit Mishra (through VC), Advocate for Defendants. No representation was made by the Applicant on the previous date. Even today, no representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.415 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondents
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
