The Second Additional Recorders Court found the applicant unreasonable absent on two consecutive dates and also without an advocate. The court held that the applicant was not interested in pursuing the case further and dismissed the Special Appeal No.199 of 2024 accordingly.
The Special Appeal No.199 of 2024 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 19.12.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.199 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. | |||
| Mr Krishna Jaiwar i/b Mr R.L. Motwani, Advocate for the Defendant. |
|||
| rst – 37 | No representation was made by the Applicant on the previous date. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.199 of 2024 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
_Roznama-MDRT-II_
Mr Krishna Jaiwar i/b Mr R.L. Motwani
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
