Dismissed
Majesty Traders v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
DRTSA/11/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 18.12.2025 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.11 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicants. Mrs Uma S. Fadia, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| rst-23 | On 28.11.2025, Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submitted that the Applicants have not contacted her for a long period and on the request, the matter was listed today for withdrawal. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. Prima facie, it appears that the Applicants are not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, S.A. No.11 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court