DRT allowed an interlocutory application for withdrawal of the transferred original application after the parties amicably settled the dispute. Consequently, the main original application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Interlocutory application allowed; Transferred Original Application No.64 of 2023 dismissed as withdrawn. Court fees to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.24
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2408 of 2023 In TRANSFERRED ORIGINALAPPLICATION NO.64 of 2023
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Ramajivan R. Yadav & Ors. … Defendants
Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 2nd January 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
02.01.2024 Sr. No.24
| TOA No.64 of 2023 |
||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Ramsajivan R. Yadav & Ors. |
| Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 14 | 1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.2408 of 2023 supported by affidavit (exhibit-14), which is taken on record. 2. Order in Interlocutory Application No.2408 of 2023 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2408 of 2023, Transferred Original Application No.64 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
