The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to make a representation on the specified date and did not appear personally or through counsel on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
20.12.2023
Sr. No.27
| SA No.70 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mukta Anand Unawane Vs. Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. On 1stDecember 2023, no representation was made | ||
| by the applicant and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no |
||
| representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application No.70 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Mukta Anand Unawane
Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
