After the parties amicably settled the dispute with no outstanding dues, the Tribunal allowed the applicant's interim application and dismissed the original application as withdrawn, directing refund of court fees.
Permission to withdraw the original application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn with refund of court fees directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.21
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2405 of 2023 In
ORIGINALAPPLICATION NO.1152 of 2023
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Darshrath Patil & Ors. … Defendants
Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkarnd January 2024.
ORDER
Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer,
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
02.01.2024 Sr. No.21
| OA No.1152 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Dashrath Patil & Ors. |
| Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.2405 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2405 of 2023, Original Application No.1152 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Radhika | Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
