DRT granted permission to withdraw the original money recovery application after the parties amicably settled the matter, resulting in the dismissal of the application as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw O.A. No.1157 of 2023; O.A. dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refund directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.23
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2409 of 2023 In
ORIGINALAPPLICATION NO.1157 of 2023
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Sambhaji Abaji Pawar & Anr. … Defendants
Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 2nd January 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
02.01.2024 Sr. No.23
| OA No.1157 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Sambhaji Abaji Pawar & Anr. |
| Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.2409 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2409 of 2023, Original Application No.1157 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Radhika | Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
