Disposed

State Bank of India v. Sudhir Devidas Gavhal

DRT7 Mar 2024TA/197/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application seeking permission to withdraw a transferred original recovery application after an amicable settlement, directing refund of court fees and return of documents, and dismissed the main application.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw Original Application No.197 of 2023; application dismissed as withdrawn; court fees to be refunded.

State Bank of India versus Sudhir Devidas Gavhal — Contract and Commercial Disputes | DRT (2024)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

¶2

Sr. No.16

¶3

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.489 of 2024 In

¶4

TRANSFERRED ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.197 of 2023

¶5

State Bank of India … Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Sudhir Devidas Gavhal … Defendant

¶8

Ms Mamta Varma i/b Mr Sachin Koli – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.

¶9

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer,^th March 2024.

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Ms Varma, representing the applicant, submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties for the amount of Rs.80 lakhs in full and final satisfaction of the applicant’s claim. It is stated that the court fees is not debited from the borrower’s account and therefore, it is entitled for the refund. Ms Varma seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted. Interlocutory Application No.489 of 2024 is allowed with no order as to costs.

¶12

Sd/-

¶13

(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶14

Radhika

¶15

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶16

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

ORDER SHEET

07.03.2024

Sr. No.16

		TOA No.197 of 2023
classifi- cation	No. of Exh.	State Bank of India Vs. Sudhir Devisas Gavhal
		Ms Mamta Varma i/b Mr Sachin Koli – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.
	11	1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.489 of 2024 supported by affidavit (exhibit- 11), which is taken on record. 2. Order in I.A. No.489 of 2024 passed separately.
		3. In view of the order passed in Interlocutory Application No.489 of 2024, Transfereed Original
		Application No.197 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to (i) refund the court fees and (ii) return the original documents as per the Rules.
		Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶21

Radhika

State Bank of India v. Sudhir Devidas Gavhal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Sudhir Devidas Gavhal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Indian Bank versus M/s. P Zaveri and Sons

Allahabad Bank versus Praful B Nisar

Mrs Angha Anil Sawant versus the Surat Peoples Co. Operative Bank Ltd.

Mr Mohammed Nabil Qureshi versus Ms Vaibhav Timber and Plywood

Bharat Lekhumal Harwani versus Fullerton India Credit Co. Ltd.

Bank of Baroda versus M/s G Chimanlal and Co.